首份文化遗产"十五五"规划里，非遗占了哪几行

中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅近日印发《文化遗产保护传承"十五五"规划》。据新华社 2026 年 10 月 20 日报道，国务院新闻办公室当日举行发布会介绍这份规划，并明确这是我国首次在文化遗产保护领域编制的五年规划。对做手艺的人来说，值得关心的不是排场，而是那几条具体到工序、到传承人、到市场的表述。以下仅为个人梳理；说到底，它把非遗从一项单独的文化工作收进了治理框架。

▍一、首次把"大遗产观"写进了国家文件

规划由 12 个正文部分和 12 个专栏构成，统筹推进文物、非物质文化遗产、历史文化名城（街区、村镇）等各领域保护工作，并在全过程中坚持把保护放在首位、合理利用、最小干预。

《文化遗产保护传承"十五五"规划》用的核心概念是"大遗产观"。所谓大遗产观，即以文化遗产这个整体概念统摄各类资源，推动物质与非物质、文化与自然遗产的协同保护。

这意味着当你看到一份文件同时讨论古建与非遗时，不再是并列摆放，而是被放进同一套治理框架。

一份摊开的政策文本与几件待整理的器物并放在工作台上

这份规划把 2030 年要达成的样子列了出来：家底先查清，治理关系随后理顺，法规进一步补齐，人才队伍持续壮大，监督行之有效，最终形成统一的保护格局。有意思的是排序——"摸清"排在"理顺"前面，这不是修辞，而是方法上的先后。

▍二、非遗的三处具体落点

先看普查。文化和旅游部非物质文化遗产司负责人在发布会上介绍，"十五五"时期将开展第二次全国非物质文化遗产普查，完善非遗项目的保护体系，加强对急需保护项目的扶持和传承。普查之所以被放在前面，是因为家底登记清楚之前，扶持落到哪些项目上缺乏依据。

再看名录与传承人的进退。文件提出健全非遗代表性项目名录动态调整机制，同时健全非遗代表性传承人名录体系，加强梯队建设。发布会还提到将进一步优化代表性传承人的认定、扶持和动态管理，完善科学规范的评估和退出机制。"动态调整"与"退出"被写在相邻的位置，指向的是认定之后的常态化管理。

第三处落在产业与场景。规划在这里把两件事放在同一段里说：一是让非遗工坊提质增效，二是让非遗进一步带动历史经典产业升级；与之并列的还有强化文化生态整体保护、培育传承体验新场景。前两句把手艺接进了产业体系，后两句把场地和体验一并纳入了保护的范围。

▍问答

问｜ "十五五"期间对非遗代表性传承人有什么新提法

答｜发布会提到两件事值得留意：一是进一步优化代表性传承人的认定、扶持和动态管理；二是完善科学规范的评估和退出机制。对积极参加传承活动、培养后继人才的传承人，在补助经费与宣传推广方面加大支持力度。这是方向上强调"能进能出"，不等于已经出台细则。

问｜非遗工坊在这份规划里被怎么定位

答｜被写进了"提高保护传承水平"这一条。规划既要求非遗工坊提质增效，也要求非遗去带动历史经典产业升级。换句话说，工坊不再只是展示点，而是同时承担生产、传承与带动产业的角色。具体认定办法与扶持标准仍以各级主管部门后续发布的文件为准。

问｜韵和鸣做的事，和规划里的哪一条对得上

答｜主要对得上"培育传承体验新场景"与"带动历史经典产业升级"这两句。我们做非遗内容的翻译与多语言直播，是把手艺讲给国外读者听；在线下做非遗会客厅，是给手艺留一个能被看见、能被上手的地方。这些都是把保护落在具体场景上的尝试，不是替政策做注解。

▍说在最后

把此前分散的保护思路收进同一份文件，本身就是一个信号：非遗不再被当成一项单独的文化工作，而是被放进更大的资产管理与治理框架里看待。对具体做事的人来说，接下来的看点是这些表述怎么变成可操作的细则。

以上仅为个人梳理，具体以官方原文为准。你最关心规划里的哪一句话？评论区聊聊。

📩 非遗项目｜匠人举荐｜跨境出海｜线下联营

欢迎留言或后台联系，我们与匠人同行。

—— 韵和鸣 · 与匠人同行

〖国〗

English

For the First Time, a "Broad View of Heritage" Became a State Document

The core notion the plan works with is a "broad view of heritage": the umbrella concept of cultural heritage governs all categories of resource, advancing coordinated protection of tangible and intangible heritage and of cultural and natural heritage.

The plan consists of twelve substantive parts and twelve columns, coordinating protection work across cultural relics, intangible cultural heritage and historic cities, districts and villages, and holding throughout to the principles of protection first, rational use and minimum intervention. The consequence is that when one document discusses old buildings and living heritage together, they are no longer placed side by side but set within a single framework of governance.

An open policy document beside several objects awaiting cataloguing, on a workbench

The document sets its main targets for 2030: resources thoroughly surveyed, the regulatory system basically straightened out, laws and rules further improved, the body of talent steadily enlarged, protection and inspection effective, and a broad pattern for heritage protection essentially formed. Note the order: mapping the resources comes before the regulatory system.

Three Places Where Living Heritage Is Addressed

The first is survey. The head of the intangible cultural heritage department of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism said at the conference that during this period China will carry out a second national survey of intangible cultural heritage, improve the protection system for items, and strengthen support for those urgently in need. It comes first for a reason: until the resources are registered, there is little basis for deciding which items support should reach.

The second concerns lists and bearers entering and leaving. The plan calls for a sound dynamic adjustment mechanism for representative items, and a sound list system for representative bearers, with stronger echelons built across generations. The conference also mentioned refining how bearers are recognised, supported and dynamically managed, with a sound, standard assessment and withdrawal mechanism. Setting dynamic adjustment alongside withdrawal points towards the loosening of lifetime titles.

The third falls on industry and setting. Here the plan puts two matters in the same passage: raising the quality and effectiveness of heritage workshops, and letting living heritage further drive the upgrading of historic classic industries. Alongside them it calls for stronger holistic protection of cultural ecologies and the cultivation of new settings for transmission and experience. The first pair connects craft to the industrial system; the second brings venues and hands-on experience within the scope of protection.

What does this period bring for representative bearers?

Two things from the conference deserve attention: refining how bearers are recognised, supported and dynamically managed, and building a sound and standard assessment and withdrawal mechanism. Those who actively take part in transmission and train successors receive greater support in subsidy funding and publicity. This signals movement in and out; it does not mean detailed rules have been published.

How are heritage workshops positioned in the plan?

It appears under the heading of raising the standard of protection and transmission. The plan proposes improving the quality and effectiveness of such workshops and deepening the way living heritage upgrades historic classic industries. In other words they are no longer display points alone but carry production, transmission and industrial upgrading at once. Specific recognition criteria and support standards remain subject to later documents from the competent authorities.

Which line in the plan does YUNHEMING's work answer to?

Mainly two lines: new settings for transmission and experience, and heritage empowering historic classic industries. We translate heritage content and run multilingual livestreams to carry these crafts to readers abroad; offline we run a heritage salon to keep a place where the work can be seen and touched. These are attempts to place protection in concrete settings, not a gloss on policy.

Gathering previously scattered approaches into one document is itself a signal: living heritage is no longer treated as a separate cultural task but placed within a larger framework of asset management and governance. For those doing the work, the thing to watch next is how these statements turn into workable rules.

ICH Projects · Artisan Referrals · Global Distribution · Salon Partnerships